I
have a very divergent opinion on this wide receiver class from most of what
I’ve read so far heading into the draft. Yes there isn’t a once in a generation
talent but I see a lot of receivers that should be in starting lineups within a
couple of seasons. If you need a WR in this draft you should be able to find a
player that fits a role and will be able to help you out.
|
Overall
|
Player
|
Team
|
Ht
|
Wt
|
Role
|
Grade
|
|
11
|
Doctson, Josh
|
TCU
|
74
|
202
|
Starter
|
7.6
|
|
19
|
Treadwell, Laquon
|
Mississippi
|
74
|
221
|
Starter
|
7.5
|
|
29
|
Thomas, Michael
|
Ohio State
|
74.75
|
212
|
Starter
|
7.3
|
|
30
|
Shepard, Sterling
|
Oklahoma
|
70.25
|
194
|
Starter
|
7.3
|
|
31
|
Coleman, Corey
|
Baylor
|
70.625
|
194
|
Starter
|
7.3
|
|
38
|
Fuller, Will
|
Notre Dame
|
72.125
|
186
|
Starter
|
7.2
|
|
49
|
Caroo, Leonte
|
Rutgers
|
71.875
|
211
|
Eventual Starter
|
7.0
|
|
50
|
Miller, Braxton
|
Ohio State
|
73.375
|
201
|
Eventual Starter
|
7.0
|
|
70
|
Thomas, Mike
|
Southern Miss
|
73
|
200
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.7
|
|
76
|
Mitchell, Malcolm
|
Georgia
|
71.625
|
198
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.6
|
|
98
|
Boyd, Tyler
|
Pittsburgh
|
73.5
|
197
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.3
|
|
99
|
Spruce, Nelson
|
Colorado
|
73.125
|
206
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.3
|
|
105
|
Moore, Chris
|
Cincinnati
|
73
|
206
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.2
|
|
110
|
Payton, Jordan
|
UCLA
|
73.125
|
207
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.1
|
|
125
|
Cajuste, Devon
|
Stanford
|
75.75
|
234
|
Potential Starter
|
5.9
|
Let’s
start at the top where I, like many lately, have Josh Doctson above Laquan
Treadwell. No, this doesn’t mean that I hate Treadwell, really like him and he
was a joy to watch in college but I just like Doctson’s skill set a bit better.
I think Doctson is more consistent at high pointing the ball, has better speed,
and they are comparable as route runners giving Doctson the slight edge. And
yes I know about Treadwell’s blocking ability, I don’t care, it’s nice to have
but it doesn’t really sway my ranks that far. All that to say I like both a
lot. Moving on to a trio of receivers who all have the same grade, but a
diverse range of skill sets. Michael Thomas has the first tie-breaker of the
trio and it has to do with body type and the way he wins. Thomas is that big
body receiver you envision as a primary target, he does a very good job of
controlling his body, and although he’s not a blazer he’s a good enough athlete
to create separation in routes and mismatches in the open field. He didn’t get the
work you’d want to see at Ohio State but Urban Meyer and company start on the
ground and go to the air when necessary. The next player in the trio is
Sterling Shepard, who may be the most complete and NFL ready player in the
draft. Shepard is the best route runner in the draft, with sure hands and a
tough streak the only thing that he lacks is height and that’s only so much of
a concern when you can do the things mid-route that he does. The last of the
trio is Corey Coleman who comes from a Baylor system that uses wideouts a bit
differently than just about everyone else. When the play was not going to the
WRs side (pass or run), the Baylor receivers are told to not go full speed to
conserve their energy as the Baylor offense looks to run a lot of plays. Coleman
is a burner, but much like the next on WR on the list he does have some issues
with drops. Whether that’s a problem like Ty Montgomery (apparently fixable) or
more like that WR whose name you no longer remember is yet to be seen. Coleman
has upside, but with a little more development than Shepard or Thomas he loses
the tie-breaker. Behind those ranked starters are a pair who truly embody the
opposite ends of the spectrum. Leonte Carroo is a player who just does
everything well. He doesn’t have a trait that pops as elite but he doesn’t have
a fatal flaw or major weakness that you can point to and say that he’s going to
fail because of it. Braxton Miller on the other hand played one year of
receiver at Ohio State after playing QB for the first three seasons before
shoulder troubles made continuing at QB untenable. Miller is raw, but he’s an
explosive athlete with a knack for how to use his athleticism in space, and an
awareness of how plays develop that comes from years of playing quarterback.
Miller is going to need to work hard to refine his skills but the flashes seen
in 2015 at Ohio State are really exciting. Behind Carroo & Miller is a
mini-tier of two prospects before a bit of a drop-off. Those two receivers are
a pair of athletic freaks who have both gone under the radar through most of
the draft season. The first is Mike Thomas out of Southern Miss. A combine
snub, Thomas is a big bodied, long receiver who wins well at the catch point
and has overblown drops issues. He’s a dynamic playmaker, who needs refinement
but he has near the highest upside in the class. The other player is Malcolm
Mitchell. I know Mitchell from games I’ve watched of Georgia’s over the past
couple of seasons and I like him a lot. Mitchell didn’t produce the way you
want, but much like the Ohio State duo it has more to do with a grounded
offense, and in Georgia’s case, atrocious QB play than Mitchell. These two both
will have impacts by year 2 and possibly before. As we move outside the top ten
into our final five receivers of my number 11 receiver is a player who I’ve
gone back and forth on how high or low he should be. Tyler Boyd is a player who
produced well for the dearth of quarterback options around him. Boyd isn’t a
great athlete, he didn’t outshine his QB situation, but he does do a pretty
good job at the catch point, is above average on his routes, and finds ways to
get open. So yeah, he’s good at a good number of things, but doesn’t flash
athletically and isn’t as developed as some would have you believe. I think I
like him, but I won’t know how to feel when he’s drafted. Nelson Spruce is a
lesser version of Shepard from earlier, just 3 inches taller and a bit less flashy.
Spruce is a quick twitch space player who was extremely productive on bad
Colorado teams. Spruce should be able to help out in the slot right away. He’s
Jordan Matthews for me. My last three WR are all upside guys for me. Chris
Moore is a burner who even in a high volume offense still put up 12.6 yards per
target. Watching Moore’s tape you see a tough player, willing to go up take a
hit and still come down with the ball. Moore needs to get better at refining
his routes but he really impressed me and should be a useful 2 or 3 for someone
in the NFL. Jordan Payton and Devon Cajuste are a pair of Pac-12 guys with promise.
We’ll start with the lower rated Cajuste is the biggest receiver of my top 15
and one of the biggest in this year’s class. Cajuste converts his size into
power with enough speed and body control to be a very good big bodied number 2.
Lastly, Payton. I may be too low on him. He’s a very well rounded receiver with
good hands and route running. He produced very well on while catching passes
from a true freshman QB in 2015. Payton isn’t a freak twitch athlete but he
converts power into speed well enough vertically to be a problem for corners.
Overall
there’s some upside here, but more importantly I think there’s a deep group,
with diverse skill sets, and relatively high ceilings on the group in general.
I’ll
add the top ten for the tight ends here. I find them tough to balance blocking and
receiving. Henry & Hooper are the only ones I’m sure on. After that, it’s a
crap shoot to me.
|
Overall
|
Player
|
Team
|
Ht
|
Wt
|
Role
|
Grade
|
|
34
|
Henry, Hunter
|
Arkansas
|
76.875
|
250
|
Starter
|
7.5
|
|
65
|
Hooper, Austin
|
Stanford
|
75.75
|
254
|
Eventual Starter
|
7.0
|
|
79
|
Duarte, Thomas
|
UCLA
|
74
|
231
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.8
|
|
91
|
Vannett, Nick
|
Ohio State
|
78
|
257
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.6
|
|
96
|
Williams, Bryce
|
East Carolina
|
77.75
|
257
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.5
|
|
109
|
Higbee, Tyler
|
WKU
|
78
|
249
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.3
|
|
117
|
Braunecker, Ben
|
Harvard
|
75.375
|
250
|
Eventual Starter
|
6.2
|
|
169
|
Sandland, Beau
|
Montana State
|
76.5
|
253
|
Potential Starter
|
5.8
|
|
181
|
Scheu, Steven
|
Vanderbilt
|
76.5
|
253
|
Potential Starter
|
5.7
|
|
221
|
Weiser, Matt
|
Buffalo
|
77
|
255
|
Potential Starter
|
5.5
|
No comments:
Post a Comment