Most Popular This Month

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

2018 College Football Previews: Independents

We start with the Independents because they associate with no one (except ND’s weird ACC affiliation). These are the football mercenaries, college football’s A-Team, soldiers of fortune who no long have a home (NMSU, UMASS) or choose not to (ND, Army, BYU, Liberty?).

The average power rating for the Independent squads is 2.55.

Note: Glosssary and P.L.U.M.P. Page

Team
Adj.
2017
W/L
%
Yards
Ret.
%
Touches
Ret.
%
Line
Starts
Ret.
%
Tackles
Ret.
%
Passes
Def.
Ret.
247
Sports
Score
Total
Points
Notre Dame
19.71
61.58%
61.34%
49.67%
76.03%
77.19%
256.57
23.43
Army
5.45
58.36%
62.77%
26.87%
76.37%
84.21%
112.02
7.28
Liberty
0
84.91%
78.60%
78.22%
72.17%
70.97%
56.65
2.84
BYU
-4.47
90.28%
89.49%
34.55%
67.21%
73.17%
167.06
-2.3
New Mexico State
-5.07
31.80%
30.94%
69.16%
78.50%
83.33%
96.22
-6.95
UMASS
-12.73
91.62%
92.32%
100.00%
58.02%
71.43%
122.34
-9.01

Notre Dame buoys the average rating, but Army and Liberty hold up well to scrutiny, although the latter is in year 2 of it’s transition to the FBS level. BYU is in a rut P.B. (Post Bronco) but returns quite a bit on offense and should continue to provide a stout defense. NMSU lost everyone on offense but should be a solid unit in year one in no-mans-land. UMASS is a poor team that at least looks intriguing on offense but soon may make the pilgrimage back to FCS sooner than later.

Top Returning Offensive Producers (Above average production)


Quarterbacks (Minimum 120 Pass Attempts)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
AY/A
AY/R
Comp%
Sack%
Andrew Ford
4
MASS
75
210
8.98
4.82
63.17%
9.70%
Stephen Calvert
3
LIB
74
180
8.34
5.27
54.11%
3.30%
Brandon Wimbush
4
ND
73
228
6.94
10.18
49.45%
8.30%
Tanner Mangum
4
BYU
75
220
5.02
3.86
57.20%
4.80%

Running Backs (Minimum 12 Touches)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
Tou.
AY/R
AY/T
RBP>12
Marquis Young
4
MASS
73
215
217
6.31
6.93
16.36
Kell Walker
3
ARMY
69
195
91
8.6
10.09
9.53
Darnell Woolfolk
4
ARMY
69
235
157
6.81
0
9.36
Jason Huntley
3
NMSU
69
175
110
6.26
8.11
8.63

Wide Receivers (Minimum 18 Targets)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
Tar.
AY/T
Cat%
WRP>18
Antonio Gandy-Golden
3
LIB
76
200
116
10.85
59.48%
13.19
Andy Isabella
4
MASS
70
195
112
10.83
58.04%
12.51
B.J. Farrow
4
LIB
74
190
54
14.15
59.26%
10.21
Cephas Reddick
4
LIB
68
175
64
10.66
59.38%
8.55
OJ Clark
3
NMSU
67
163
65
8.58
72.31%
8.47
Anthony Muse
3
NMSU
72
160
58
8.8
72.41%
8.11
Damian King
4
LIB
71
175
111
6.72
59.46%
7.9

Tight Ends (Minimum 12 Targets)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
Tar.
AY/T
Cat%
TEP>12
Matt Bushman
2
BYU
77
230
78
7.41
62.82%
29.77

Liberty and their merry band of party crashers (and unfortunately Baylor mess alumnus) should be fun on offense and enter their first full FBS campaign with and intriguing JR QB and four receivers that with at least 50 targets last season. Army of course pulls rank with 50% of the above average RBs, and BYU brings back 17th year senior Tanner Mangum and sophomore TE Matt Bushman who may be the only other functioning offensive skill player on the roster from last season in Provo.

Top Returning Defensive Producers (Above average production)


Interior Defensive Linemen (INT) (Minimum 12 Points)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
Tkls
TFLs
Sacks
PDs
Points
Cedric Wilcots II
3
NMSU
76
260
21
12
8.5
3
206.13
Sione Takitaki
4
BYU
74
245
61
13
5
2
180
Corbin Kaufusi
4
BYU
81
285
51.5
7.5
6
1
132.38
Jerry Tillery
4
ND
78
306
40.5
9
4.5
0
117
Khalid Kareem
3
ND
76
266
15.5
5.5
3
2
97.13
Roy Lopez
3
NMSU
74
310
25
4.5
2
3
96.75
Daelin Hayes
3
ND
75
258
23.5
6.5
3
1
94.13
Khyris Tonga
2
BYU
76
340
14
4
2
3
90
Jake Byczko
2
MASS
75
250
14.5
2
0
3
58.63

Edge Rushers (EDGE) (Minimum 12 Points)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
Tkls
TFLs
Sacks
PDs
Points
Juwan Wells
4
LIB
74
255
58.5
11
4.5
4
169.84

Off-Ball Linebackers (OBLB) (Minimum 12 Points)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
Tkls
TFLs
Sacks
PDs
Points
Terrill Hanks
4
NMSU
75
225
79.5
15
7
8
185.55
Te'Von Coney
4
ND
73
240
86
12.5
3
0
116.65
Jarell Addo
4
MASS
73
200
49.5
8
1
6
107.4
James Nachtigal
4
ARMY
72
235
78
8
5
3
94.89
Kenneth Brinson
4
ARMY
74
245
30.5
4.5
4
4
73.98
Cole Christiansen
3
ARMY
74
225
66
5
0
2
64.13
Leon McQuaker
4
NMSU
73
212
34.5
6.5
3
1
56.24
Lui Fa'amasino
4
NMSU
72
230
44.5
4.5
0.5
0
55.48
Butch Pau'u
4
BYU
72
230
55.5
3
0
2
49.41

Cornerbacks (CB) (Minimum 12 Points)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
Tkls
TFLs
Sacks
PDs
Points
Julian Love
3
ND
71
193
57
1
0
23
112
Isaiah Rodgers
3
MASS
70
175
43
3
0
17
97
Lee Moses
4
MASS
71
200
32
1
0
10
76
Ron LaForce
4
NMSU
73
187
80
1
0
8
59.5
Shaun Crawford
4
ND
69
176
26
1.5
1.5
7
51.38
Jeremy Peters
4
LIB
70
190
32
4
0
3
51

Free Safeties (FS) (Minimum 12 Points)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
Tkls
TFLs
Sacks
PDs
Points
Shamad Lomax
3
NMSU
70
200
59.5
3.5
1
11
196.56
Malik Demby
4
NMSU
74
230
35.5
11
6.5
1
127.72
Zayne Anderson
4
BYU
74
200
51
0
0
4
106.44
DeMarcus Owens
4
NMSU
70
191
41
1
0
10
81.88
Jaylon McClinton
3
ARMY
70
200
37
1.5
1
1
75.41

Strong Safeties (SS) (Minimum 12 Points)
Player
Year
Team
Height
Weight
Tkls
TFLs
Sacks
PDs
Points
Dayan Ghanwoloku
3
BYU
71
195
47.5
1
0
8
87.49
Tyler Hayes
4
MASS
72
215
41.5
3
0
5
80.96
Max Regan
4
ARMY
74
200
27
0.5
0
5
64.46

Both Notre Dame and BYU play 3-4 defenses and so it’s not surprising that both squads put four players in the top producers for the three front-seven positions groups. There isn’t much edge talent here, but that generally goes for all mid-majors as we’ll see as we move forward. NMSU brings back a penetrating 5-tech in Wilcots and a stout nose tackle in 310-pound junior Roy Lopez. In fact, NMSU is secretly talented on defense Hanks probably reclassifies as an Edge player for the draft at his size, but combo of tackles/TFLs/sacks would be good in any conference. Add in a couple more productive seniors at LB, LaForce at CB, and a Trio of productive safeties and you have a defense that should allow an offense that lost long time producers to find their identity. ND and BYU will have solid defenses and recruit well enough to fill holes that appear, and UMASS joins Notre Dame with a pair of productive corners.

No comments:

Post a Comment